EatingIsImportant
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Walking Is Important

June 17-19 food diary-- Shenandoah

7/30/2016

0 Comments

 
June 17
The first day of our mini-break!  We have an ordinary breakfast: lemon water, coffee, smoothie.  After getting kid squared away and packing ourselves, more decaf coffee for the road.  And off in the direction of Shenandoah National Park.

We arrive at lunchtime, too early to stop into our hotel room.  So we scout out the small town of Luray, VA for someplace to eat, and end up at what is clearly the town's trendy hotspot: a combination coffeehouse/restaurant called "The Gathering Grounds."  All small-town coffee-houses are required to make some kind of pun on the word "grounds."  The clientele is an odd mix of student-types with laptops and elderly couples having a staid sandwich.  Everyone is white, though, which is something that, after some years living just outside of DC, we now notice and remark upon.  A sea of whiteness-- which I got used to after some years living in Montana-- now makes me feel uncomfortable, as though something potentially sinister were going on.  We order coffee and chicken salad sandwiches; I have potato chips.  The food is fine, the coffee terrible, even though it is most likely the best coffee in town. 

We take a pleasant afternoon stroll along Luray's outstanding riverside walkways-- huge investments have been made here in green space and beautification, despite the tiny size of the town.  There are more murals here in a small radius than practically anywhere else I have ever been.  There are lots of ducks and other waterfowl-- a least bittern is there, and a black-crowned night heron, and a duck that I try and try to identify, but which does not seem to exist.  Finally this helps (thanks, Cornell).  Some kind of mallard-y hybrid, I reckon.  And yet it looked like a totally plausible wild duck.
River with ducks, etc.
​When 4:00 rolls around, we go check out our cabin, which I can whole-heartedly recommend.  For $95/night, there is a medium-sized bedroom (decorated with artificial flowers and teddy bears by someone's great-grandma, but no matter), a large bathroom with skylight, a small hallway/closet area with full-sized coffee pot, refrigerator, and real mugs... and not one, but two porches!-- a sunny front porch looking out on the parking lot (the only place where the wifi works well), and a lovely shaded back porch facing a burbling stream and, on the other side of the stream, forest.  We buy coffees (decaf for me) in the hotel restaurant, and spend some time resting, hanging out on the back porch, enjoying the set-up.  I mentioned, when I reserved the cabin, that we were celebrating our 5th anniversary, and the staff have left us an assortment of tiny "gift shop"-type gifts, including a Virginia shot glass decorated all over with little hearts.

We are not ready for dinner until what turns out to be late for Luray-- on a Friday night, lots of places seem to close at 8:00, or even earlier.  We end up at a place called "Mok-N-She's" (a pun, I guess?) whose crowded parking lot makes it look popular, and general festooning with American flags strikes us as potentially alarming.  However, Mok-N-She's turns out to be friendly, tasty, and cheap.  We both eat BBQ sandwiches, topped with coleslaw, and french fries, and enjoy the heck out of them.  From here on out, every restaurant meal we eat in the Luray area costs precisely $19-and-change (plus tip) for two people.  (Hip "Gathering Grounds" cost us a few dollars more.)  There is an artificial flower on the table in an American-flag pattern, and an artificial Christmas tree behind me covered in American-flag ornaments.  My husband keeps mentioning, hopefully, that Flag Day just passed, but these things look like permanent fixtures to me.

Home to bed, all full of middle-American fried food and charm.
 
June 18
We sleep in a little, drink hotel-coffeemaker coffee on our back porch in the dappled morning sunshine.  It is lovely.  It's around 10:30 before we mosey on over to the hotel restaurant for some breakfast.  We're kind of overwhelmed by yesterday's consumption of heavy food, so we have breakfasts on the lighter side: for me, 2 eggs, toast (homemade!), a fruit cup, decaf coffee.  Then we have the restaurant ladies pack up some bag lunches for the road, and head into Shenandoah NP. 
We stop at a rest area to pee and find that the Appalachian Trail passes right through. So we walk on a little tiny bit of it.
On the short Limberlost Trail.
The mountain laurel on the Limberlost Trail reminded me of my childhood.
​Driving, beautiful overlooks and vistas, a brief stroll here and there, a cup of good coffee-- at last!-- from the Park concession at Skyland.  We eat our lunches late, around 3:00, sitting on boulders near the Crescent Rock Overlook.  Mine is a turkey sandwich-- made from real, thick-sliced roast turkey, with lettuce and tomato, but unfortunately NOT on homemade bread this time but some kind of supermarket white bread that gums up and sticks to my teeth.  Little sandwich baggie of ripple chips.  An orange that turns out to be secretly rotten.  An apple-cinnamon Nutrigrain bar (my mom would be so pleased).  When we ordered our lunches, which had been billed as "sandwich, chips, fruit and drink," the waitress said in a worried voice, "I'm not sure if we have any candy bars left."  We quickly assured her that it was ok, we didn't need any candy bars!  But apparently these Nutrigrain bars were offered as a substitute.  I hadn't been planning on eating mine, but when my orange was bad I needed something as solace.
So many vistas like this.
Big Meadows
​After lunch, a wander around Big Meadows, then back towards our cabin for a rest before dinner.  We hang out on the porch, read, fall asleep.  Concerned that everything will be closing again, I wake my husband a little after 7 to go forage for dinner.  This time we drive to the next town, New Market, another 14 miles away, scout out all the nearby restaurants, and choose-- my husband chooses, I'll put the responsibility on him-- the Jalisco Mexican restaurant, which also has the advantage of being open until a sophisticated 10:30 on this Saturday night.  As it turns out, my city-boy husband has never in his life been to a small-town Mexican restaurant and doesn't know the risks; but, in his defense, the place does appear to be run by genuine Hispanic people.  There's a big free basket of standard fried tortilla chips, salsa that seems unusually mild, and the odd addition of a little dish of coleslaw to dip your chips into.  Nothing unpleasant, even though the idea of coleslaw with chips is an unusual one.  I add some habanero sauce to the slaw, and that improves the situation.  My husband orders a burrito platter (one chicken and one beef burrito), and I order soft tacos with carne asada.  The tacos are served (strangely, I think) with a choice of either lettuce and cheese or cilantro and onion.  Why not all of the above?  But I choose cilantro and onion, and my waitress nods approval, telling me "they're good that way" in a tone that suggests few people are so in-the-know.  Then she proceeds to deliver tacos with lettuce and cheese instead, with an impassive expression that suggests there is no point in complaining.  The "carne asada" seems entirely unseasoned, except for salt.  There is no flavor whatsoever.  I load them up with some more salsa (from the chips) and some habanero sauce (I don't typically use habanero sauce, but it wasn't very spicy either).  These tacos are one of the blandest things I have ever eaten.

Meanwhile, my husband, who is really not very picky about food quality, seems stunned by his burritos.  One is full of unseasoned shredded chicken and nothing else (except for the lettuce, cheese, sauce, and sour cream on the outside).  The other is filled with some kind of oily ground beef.  Much worse than my meal, but I feel his pain: I have eaten burritos like this before, in other small towns, in other times.  To some extent, it is a matter of local taste rather than restaurant quality; for instance, the most recent Yelp review of this restaurant reads "My friend, Brad, and I stopped at this place on our way through to town. I had probably one of the best burritos in my life."  Unless this review is intended as some kind of sick joke, I have to conclude that some people like this kind of aggressively bland cuisine.  The check comes to $19.

I promise to make it up to my husband by taking him to the outdoor frozen custard place we saw on our way into New Market.  There is a long line.  The people in front of us have a couple of restless kids and are controlling them by grabbing arms and twisting.  The vehicles in the parking lot are all massive.  Everybody is ordering elaborate, often colorful menu items, many of which I cannot identify.  Eventually we get our plain old custards-- a small vanilla cone for me, the plainest there is.  Then we sit on a reeking bench outside a cigarette store that's closed for the night, and eat them.  It is nice.  But we are eager to go back to Luray.  New Market just doesn't have the same friendly vibe.
 
June 19
Sunday morning; we're going home today.  We have last coffees on our sylvan back porch.  Late in the morning, one more stop at the Brookside hotel restaurant.  We both have ham-and-egg scrambles (they also contain potatoes) with biscuits on the side.  I have butter and honey on my biscuits.  More coffee.  Check: $19.

We are sad to leave the Brookside.  While we are checking out, the owner asks us whether we have seen any bears wandering around behind the cabins.  We haven't.

I have planned a long, meandering drive home, because I like that sort of thing.  When we get back, my stepson will be coming for dinner in honor of Father's Day.  So we stop at a farm stand, not far from Point of Rocks, MD, to pick up a few veggies.  I buy sugar snap peas, a tomato, a red pepper, broccoli, and an entire large basil plant.  We also buy a pie for dessert: apple walnut.  Total cost $31.

Dinner is to be simple, given that we're coming home at 4:30, having a guest at 6:00.  I roast a few vegetables for better flavor-- broccoli, red pepper, tomato-- then saute these with garlic, onion, sugar snap peas, and lots of fresh basil.  At the same time cook spaghetti noodles.  Combine all together with tons of shredded parmesan.  Voila, balanced meal.  Also a side salad of mixed lettuces, cilantro, and tomato, with a balsamic vinaigrette.  Glass of white wine.  Plus a Q ginger soda before dinner.  Also, apple walnut pie, which is surprisingly good (you never know with "homemade" pies), and decaf coffee.
0 Comments

What begins ugly doesn't end that way

7/29/2016

0 Comments

 
I had every intention of putting together an assemblage something like this one from Huffington Post, in which mostly male pundits complained about Hillary Clinton's voice quality last night during and after her acceptance of the nomination.

In fact, after watching the speech myself, I arose while saying to my husband, "I think she did pretty well!  But just wait, people are going to be complaining about her facial expressions."  You see, after the first few minutes (during which Clinton had smiled almost frantically, in a way that actually did bug me because of its manifest artificiality), Hillary settled back into her own speaking style, complete with occasional frowns and (at the climax of her speech) intense, flashing eyes.  Now, don't get me wrong.  I"m perfectly aware that, in a male speaker, an air of seriousness and an aura of intensity would be viewed as wholly appropriate, even charismatic.  But how often have we heard from pundits that Hillary Clinton should smile more?  I was afraid the same criticisms would instantly reappear.

(People all know that the smile originates with apes as a submissive signal, right?  We smile, first and foremost, to demonstrate our non-aggression with each other.  Friendliness.  But we might want to pause before insisting that women, especially, must consistently telegraph their submissiveness.  Any other waitresses out there been nudged by older male customers to "smile!"  Does this happen to you much, male servers?  How about you, white male presidents?)  

So, I worried.  And I assumed.  And I figured today I would look around at responses to Clinton's speech, and easily gather more material nitpicking at her face, voice, clothing, and general demeanor than could possibly be assimilated into a short discussion of sexism in political commentary.

Of course, these sexist, superficial responses do exist.  On the Politico page where Hillary's remarks are printed in full, the very first comment (by a woman, no less!) reads, "Why does the poor old hag keep having to clear her throat?" 

Um, maybe she's giving a long speech in a large arena and could use a glass of water.  Poor old hag.

Unsurprisingly, the conservative press does not leave us without plenty of examples of this crap.  The National Review's article about her convention speech called her presentation "her usual hectoring."  A commenter on this piece revisited the "hag" meme: 
"The more Hillary speaks the more her poll numbers drop.  Nobody wants a Hag in chief."

Apparently, the press has by now been called out so often for these misogynist attitudes that the National Review felt the need to write a separate defense of why their attacks on Clinton's voice and personality are not sexist.  Their next article, "Hillary's Critics Don't Hate Her Because She's a Woman," (subtitle: "They Hate Her Because She's Hillary") begins with the sentence, "Hillary Clinton has a heinous, grating, and dissonant voice."
 But, the author argues, the fact that he has at times enjoyed the speeches of other women (Michelle Obama; Laura Ingraham; Sarah Palin) makes it impossible for sexism to be present in his critique.  Hillary, in his view, is simply uniquely "unappetizing."  (Just think about that word choice for a bit.  Let's imagine, reader, that you are a Democrat who abhorred George W. Bush.  Would you describe him as "unappetizing?"  Or would you perhaps choose some other term that did not suggest he was a dish to be consumed?)

So... because Michelle Obama has an amazing talent for smiling widely while she speaks (a fact that I noted on Monday night, and immediately realized that this alone might account for her much greater popularity as First Lady)... does this then mean that requiring successful women to smile while speaking is not sexist?  If you enjoy the dulcet tones of some women's speech and find another's to be "hectoring" and "lecturing," indeed "grating" and "heinous" (yet rarely comment on the vocal quality of men's delivery), does this mean that your vocal requirements for women are not sexist?   

Or perhaps it's not that you hate women; it's that you hate women who don't act according to your sense of proper womanliness.  From the comments section: "Part of why we hate her is because she is not a woman, Her ruthlessness makes Dick Cheney seem like Richard Simmons."  So much to unpack here.  Why bring poor Richard Simmons into it?  With apologies to him, obviously this means "Hillary Clinton is so masculine that she could emasculate a tough guy like Dick Cheney."

Or, one can just keep it simple: "Hillary is as ugly as the bottom of an outhouse pit."  Sounds like Trump channeling to me.

Okay, but here's where things get better.  Up until now I have been (mostly) citing the articles and comments section of a markedly right-wing publication.  Honestly, what would you expect to find?  So, my plan for the second half of this piece was to head on over to the liberal blogs, where (in my admittedly outdated experience) plenty of misogynistic Clinton-haters also hang out, and find them saying the Same. Damn. Things.

Only they weren't.


Daily Kos, where I practically lived for 4 years from 2004-2008 (I met my husband there!), can always be counted on to have a substantial and loud contingent who support Hillary, and an equally substantial and loud contingent who support the Other Guy (in 2008, that was Obama; in this case, Bernie).  That is still true, I think.  But here are some things that the former Bernie supporters were saying about Clinton's speech:

What an amazing week. The four days gave people time to celebrate Bernie and the platform (and Clinton herself) commits to significant progressive priorities that will benefit so many. And I thought her speech last night was her best ever. [...]  I'm (still) a Sanders supporter and (also) all in for Hillary. 

I thought the convention was an incredible success and I enjoyed watching every minute of it. I am still sad about Bernie’s loss but I plan to volunteer for Hillary, which I was planning to do before the convention. After the convention I know more about Hillary and I’m very proud and excited that we will elect the first woman president in November [...]  The speeches were amazing[...]  Hillary’s speech was the topper. I’m so proud of her and of this country.

.
..​Hillary has not shoved the left out the door at all.  Her speech outlined a very progressive agenda which included a good portion of Bernie’s message along with some ideas as to how to combat income inequality.  Hillary heard their voices during the primary, she needs help putting their plans into action and not being shouted down.  [...]  Protest is important when your voice isn’t heard.  Once someone starts to listen, you need to be willing to come to the table with plans. 
​

I was a late comer to the Hilliary campaign, having been a Bernie supporter with the intention of supporting the Democratic nominee should he not prevail. [...]  So, I came into the Convention backing Hilliary as the Democratic nominee, not as the first woman nominated by a major party nominee. Yet, as the Convention aired night after night, I found myself in awe of our Party; our diversity, our passion, our determination, our pride in, and love for, our current President & First Family and Vice President & Second Family, our current Presidential & Vice Presidential nominees & their families, and of America, our great country.[...]  You guessed it, by the time Chelsea had finished her wonderfully warm and loving introduction of her mother, I was bawling like a baby. I am no longer an unwilling backer of Hilliary Clinton. Deal me in.

I  am voting for Hillary, not the lesser of two evils, because my party showed me who she really is, warts and all.


In browsing through hundreds of comments there, I did not see one that referred to Hillary Clinton as a hag or a bitch, or even expressed "concern" about her voice or face or carriage.  And I can tell you, THAT IS REAL PROGRESS.  

Someone did refer to Megyn Kelly as "a tool," which, while an ad hominem attack, is at least not sexist.

Returning to a broader media scope: I browsed a great many mainstream press pieces about Clinton's acceptance speech.  Apart from the National Review, almost all of them focused on the content of her speech.  Maybe they were effectively shamed back in March, when even the likes of USA Today pointed out that male pundits were focusing disproportionately on her unfeminine delivery.  But, whatever the reason, they have done much better today, and, America, that is something to be proud of.

Maybe this country really is ready for a female president.


0 Comments

Wednesday Democratic Convention highlights

7/27/2016

0 Comments

 









​You know what made me mad on Wednesday night?  A faction of the audience at the convention chanting "No More War" so loudly that it significantly distracted attention from former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta saying this (my transcription):

"Donald Trump asks our troops to commit war crimes, endorses torture, spurns our allies from Europe to Asia, suggests that countries have nuclear weapons, and he praises dictators from Saddam Hussein to Vladimir Putin.  Today-- only today-- let me point out something that just happened today.  Donald Trump, today, once again took Russia's side.  He asked the Russians to interfere in American politics.  Think about that.  Think about that for a moment.  Donald Trump, who wants to be president of the United States, is asking one of our adversaries to engage in hacking, or intelligence efforts, against the United States of America to affect an election.  As someone who was responsible for protecting our nation from cyberattacks, it is inconceivable to me that any presidential candidate would be that irresponsible.  I say this out of a firm concern for the future of my children and grandchildren: Donald Trump cannot become our commander-in-chief."
I am not a fan of our still-too-hawkish military policy either.  But what Panetta was saying at that moment was crucial, highly topical, and potentially convincing to voters who might not be members of the choir.  It needed to be heard loud and clear.  But even I had trouble listening through the drama of the disruption.  And headlines this morning tended to focus on the protest instead of Panetta's message.  Does anybody really, truly, 100% honestly believe that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are "equally as horrible?"  Or can those of us who don't like Clinton (I kind of do) try and remember what "lesser" means when they announce that they don't want to "pick between the lesser of two evils?"  When there are only two possible outcomes, WHY WOULD YOU NOT PICK WHAT YOU YOURSELF HAVE IDENTIFIED AS THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS?

(Side note: on the topic of Clinton's and Trump's alleged similarities, I have found what may be the stupidest political opinion piece ever written for a mainstream news site.  Thanks, CNN!)

Okay.  So that was Panetta.  Now some excerpts from a couple of people who weren't relentlessly heckled.  

Michael Bloomberg's speech-- and he's not even a Democrat (he spoke in favor of Bush at the 2004 Republican convention), and  he's a billionaire like Trump, so why are we not heckling him if we're going to heckle somebody?-- anyway, Bloomberg's speech may have seemed like lukewarm support from the point of view of Clinton supporters.  It basically cast Clinton as... the lesser of two evils.  And, again, as far as undecided voters go, it is the exact speech that needs to be made, over and over and over again.

There are times when I disagree with Hillary. But whatever our disagreements may be, I've come here to say: We must put them aside for the good of our country. And we must unite around the candidate who can defeat a dangerous demagogue. [...]

Throughout his career, Trump has left behind a well-documented record of bankruptcies, thousands of lawsuits, angry shareholders and contractors who feel cheated, and disillusioned customers who feel ripped off. Trump says he wants to run the nation like he's run his business. God help us. [...]
The bottom line is: Trump is a risky, reckless, and radical choice. And we can't afford to make that choice!

Now, I know Hillary Clinton is not flawless; no candidate is. But she is the right choice — and the responsible choice — in this election. No matter what you may think about her politics or her record, Hillary Clinton understands that this is not reality television; this is reality. She understands the job of president. It involves finding solutions, not pointing fingers, and offering hope, not stoking fear. [...]


​The presidency of the United States is the most powerful office in the world, and so I say to my fellow Independents: Your vote matters now. Your vote will determine the future of your job, your business, and our future together as a country.

To me, this election is not a choice between a Democrat and a Republican. It's a choice about who is better to lead our country right now: better for our economy, better for our security, better for our freedom, and better for our future. 

There is no doubt in my mind that Hillary Clinton is the right choice this November. So tonight, as an Independent, I am asking you to join with me — not out of party loyalty, but out of love of country. And together, let's elect Hillary Clinton as the next President of the greatest country in the world, the United States of America.


I can't believe I am quoting extensively from a speech by the 8th-richest person in the world, ​a man who supported George W. Bush, and a man who could say, elsewhere in his speech last night, "When I enter the voting booth each time, I look at the candidate, not the party label."  (Ow, the stupid hurts!  You are aware of how our legislatures work under a two-party system, right?)  But that is kind of the point.  All kinds of non-insane people can and should come together now to support the non-insane candidate, whether we agree on all the finer points or not, even whether we agree on the big points or not.  Hillary Clinton is the non-insane candidate.  Ergo, we must fight for her.

Finally, for anyone (like myself) who fell asleep before our beloved President Obama, who finally took the podium close to 11 pm, got very far into his remarks: let me leave you with a selection of his well-chosen words.
This guy.
Now, eight years ago, Hillary and I were rivals for the Democratic nomination.  We battled for a year and a half.  Let me tell you, it was tough, because Hillary’s tough.  Every time I thought I might have that race won, Hillary just came back stronger.

But after it was all over, I asked Hillary to join my team.  She was a little surprised, but ultimately said yes – because she knew that what was at stake was bigger than either of us.  And for four years, I had a front-row seat to her intelligence, her judgment, and her discipline.  I came to realize that her unbelievable work ethic wasn’t for praise or attention – that she was in this for everyone who needs a champion.  [...]

You know, nothing truly prepares you for the demands of the Oval Office.  Until you’ve sat at that desk, you don’t know what it’s like to manage a global crisis, or send young people to war.  But Hillary’s been in the room; she’s been part of those decisions.  She knows what’s at stake in the decisions our government makes for the working family, the senior citizen, the small business owner, the soldier, and the veteran.  Even in the middle of crisis, she listens to people, and keeps her cool, and treats everybody with respect.  And no matter how daunting the odds; no matter how much people try to knock her down, she never, ever quits. 

​That’s the Hillary I know.  That’s the Hillary I’ve come to admire.  And that’s why I can say with confidence there has never been a man or a woman more qualified than Hillary Clinton to serve as President of the United States of America. [...]

And then there’s Donald Trump.  He’s not really a plans guy.  Not really a facts guy, either.  He calls himself a business guy, which is true, but I have to say, I know plenty of businessmen and women who’ve achieved success without leaving a trail of lawsuits, and unpaid workers, and people feeling like they got cheated.

Does anyone really believe that a guy who’s spent his 70 years on this Earth showing no regard for working people is suddenly going to be your champion?  [...]

America is already great. America is already strong. And I promise you, our strength, our greatness does not depend on Donald Trump.

In fact, it doesn't depend on any one person. And that, in the end, may be the biggest difference in this election, the meaning of our democracy. [...]

America has never been about what one person says he'll do for us. It's about what can be achieved by us, together, through the hard and slow and sometimes frustrating, but ultimately enduring work of self-government.

And that's what Hillary Clinton understands. She knows that this is a big, diverse country, she has seen it, she's traveled, she's talked to folks and she understands that most issues are rarely black and white. She understands that even when you're 100 percent right, getting things done requires compromise. That democracy doesn't work if we constantly demonize each other. [...]

These are the things that Hillary knows. It can be frustrating, this business of democracy. Trust me, I know. Hillary knows, too. When the other side refuses to compromise, progress can stall. People are hurt by the inaction. Supporters can grow impatient and worry that you're not trying hard enough, that you've maybe sold out.

But I promise you, when we keep at it, when we change enough minds, when we deliver enough votes, then progress does happen. And if you doubt that, just ask the 20 million more people who have health care today. Just ask the Marine who proudly serves his country without hiding the husband that he loves. [...]

See, my grandparents, they came from the heartland. Their ancestors began settling there about 200 years ago. I don't know if they had their birth certificates, but they were there.

They were Scotch-Irish mostly, farmers, teachers, ranch hands, pharmacists, oil rig workers. Hardy, small-town folks. Some were Democrats, but a lot of them, maybe even most of them were Republicans, the party of Lincoln. And my grandparents explained that folks in these parts, they didn't like show-offs, they didn't admire braggarts or bullies.

They didn't respect mean-spiritedness or folks who were always looking for shortcuts in life. Instead, they valued traits like honesty and hard work, kindness, courtesy, humility, responsibility; helping each other out. That's what they believed in. True things, things that last, the things we try to teach our kids.

And what my grandparents understood was that these values weren't limited to Kansas. They weren't limited to small towns. These values could travel to Hawaii.
​
They could travel even the other side of the world, where my mother would end up working to help poor women get a better life trying to apply those values. My grandparents knew these values weren't reserved for one race; they could be passed down to a half- Kenyan grandson, or a half-Asian granddaughter; in fact, they were the same values Michelle's parents, the descendants of slaves, taught their own kids living in a bungalow on the south side of Chicago.

They knew these values were exactly what drew immigrants here, and they believed that the children of those immigrants were just as American as their own, whether they wore a cowboy hat or a yarmulke, a baseball cap or a hijab.

America has changed over the years. But these values that my grandparents taught me, they haven't gone anywhere. They're as strong as ever; still cherished by people of every party, every race, every faith. They live on in each of us. What makes us American, what makes us patriots is what's in here. That's what matters.

And that's why we can take the food and music and holidays and styles of other countries and blend it into something uniquely our own. That's why we can attract strivers and entrepreneurs from around the globe to build new factories and create new industries here. That's why our military can look the way it does, every shade of humanity, forged into common service. That's why anyone who threatens our values, whether fascists or communists or jihadists or homegrown demagogues, will always fail in the end.


​I will miss you, dear Mr. President: the only truly great president of my lifetime so far.  May we not tarnish your legacy by immediately electing a maniac to undo everything you've accomplished.
0 Comments

The November 2016 election-- even more important than eating

7/26/2016

2 Comments

 
This is one of those times when it is hard not to turn every blog into a political blog.  I am horrified right now, people.  And I have nothing more worthy or insightful to say than anyone else, but still, I cannot help but take a moment to say: WTF?  WTF, America?  
Bizarrely available via Weebly's free image library.
Do you want this two-dimensional billboard of a two-bit dictator to be your head of state?  Because that is exactly what you are flirting with.  Rumor has it that actual governing will be delegated, as befits a leader who has no interest in being more than a paper tiger.  Unless it turns out that he is basically Mussolini.  It is not clear which one it will be, which is a stunning risk to take.

Meanwhile, while all the posturing, xenophobic policy-making, and/or violation of civil liberties are taking place, SOME VERY URGENT PROBLEMS WILL GO UNADDRESSED.  This, to my mind, is the greatest danger of a Donald Trump presidency.  Donald Trump does not believe climate change is a problem.  Donald Trump thinks gun laws should be even less restrictive, to the point that even the NRA finds his positions extreme.  Trump doesn't think the federal government should be in the business of setting a national minimum wage.  Trump's response to suffering outside our national borders is to build a wall, stick our fingers in our ears, and hum loud.

In particular: sane people know that, if we do not do everything we can to slow climate change RIGHT THIS MINUTE, and redouble those efforts constantly via improved technology and cultural adaptation, much of humanity will not survive for long, and many of those who are surviving will be getting by only by the skin of their teeth.  WE CANNOT AFFORD TO WAIT UNTIL THIS STUPID, SELF-DEFEATING NATIONAL WHIM PLAYS ITSELF OUT.  We don't have 4 years, or 8 years, or longer than that if our current political system is subverted.  Not only the future of the United States is at stake, but, by virtue of our emissions as well as our foreign and economic policies, the entire world will potentially fall victim to the vagaries of our national freaking mood.

Hillary Clinton isn't perfect, but she will keep us moving-- albeit more slowly than I would like-- in the right direction while we search for better answers.  She can at least correctly identify many of the problems, even if she doesn't have all the solutions handy.  She is basically on the right side of most issues, and she has the practical experience-- in multiple branches of government-- to know how things actually get accomplished.  Would I like someone with a magic wand to come along and change the world radically, right now, to my specifications?  Of course!  And Hillary Clinton will not be that person.

But she's also not a crook, nor a whore, nor a lying bitch; and she's certainly-- and I can't believe I even have to make this distinction-- not an egocentric fascist (and possible tool of Russia?), which makes her far superior to Donald J. Trump.  So I'm not going let her imperfections send me into a hissy fit resulting in a protest vote for a) the most dangerous presidential candidate we've seen in a long time, b) Jill Stein (whom you know damn well can't win) or c) nobody, nobody, nobody, I'll put my fingers in my ears and hum loud and STAY HOME.  Please, people!  I don't actually believe it is hyperbole to say, THE FUTURE OF THE ENTIRE WORLD IS AT STAKE.  Not that Hillary Clinton can save the world.  But Donald Trump could certainly destroy it.

I know, it sounds like hysteria.  But he could!  Directly, or much more likely, indirectly, while he is farting around with his walls and his fomenting of hatreds and erecting of statues in his own honor.  We do not have time for this.

And for those who are beginning to wail that, because of a few recent polls showing him in an improved position, Trump has already won...  you're making me so angry I can hardly see straight.  Believe me, I can relate to your sense of panic.  But, if we have less than four months to avert the apocalypse, please let's not use this time wearing sackcloth and lying in ashes.  If you live in a state that is at all competitive, go volunteer for the Clinton campaign right now.  If you don't, donate what you can.  Talk to people.  Stay informed and don't propagate nonsense.  WE MUST WIN AND WE WILL.

The alternative is unthinkable.
2 Comments
<<Previous

    Whodunit

    The author is a waitress, home cook, and foodie who has trouble sticking to a subject.  She currently resides and works in the Maryland suburbs of D.C..

    Archives

    June 2018
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    July 2014
    June 2014

    Categories

    All
    Bon Appetit
    Food Diary
    Guts
    Jennifer Reese
    Kitchen Practices
    Madhur Jaffrey
    Miscellany
    Mridula Baljekar
    Nonpienary
    Pie Of The Month
    Politics
    Rants
    Recipes
    Recommended Reading
    Restaurant Reviews
    Smitten Kitchen
    The Cat
    Things That Have Nothing To Do With Food



    Other people who eat, walk, and/or have to live in this effin' country:
    The Tipsy Baker
    Smitten Kitchen
    ​Orangette
    ​Cooking Without a Net
    ​My Name is Yeh
    ​
    A Sweet Spoonful
    ​
    Jack Monroe
    Lottie + Doof
    Two Red Bowls
    ​VSB




Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos used under Creative Commons from 4MamaMagazine, jdavis, Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, Andy Hay, Andy Hay, Jerk Alert Productions, machaq, vere+photo, AlishaV, oonhs, wuestenigel, NIHClinicalCenter, JeepersMedia, Ly Thien Hoang (Lee), James St. John, N@ncyN@nce, fourpointgo, WeTravel.com, vagueonthehow, paraflyer, Tac6 Media, my little red suitcase, BarnImages.com, Kirinohana, Tony Webster, Lorie Shaull, roger4336, jules:stonesoup, torbakhopper, 2KoP, Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, entouriste, Laura Northrup, Sam Howzit, toniv90, espinr, leostrakosch, ell brown, Calgary Reviews, entouriste, Hey Paul Studios, Nrbelex, Gerry Dincher, kelvinf19, Natalia Volna itravelNZ@ travel app, perpetualplum, NCinDC, AlishaV, m01229, LifeSupercharger, NathanReed, madelinewright, mikecogh, regan76, JeepersMedia, Steiner Studios, spratt504, Matthew Paul Argall, melanie.lebel94, stu_spivack, Calgary Reviews, Kristoffer Trolle, Tambako the Jaguar, Mr.Sai, JeepersMedia, emleung, televisione, Ruth and Dave, Upupa4me, b-j-oe-r-n, Franco Folini, Green Mountain Girls Farm, Roberto Verzo, MAURO CATEB, pacomexico, takomabibelot